Comparative Pharmacognostical, Preliminary Phytochemical and Acute Toxicological Evaluation of Blumea lacera var lacera and Blumea eriantha DC.

 

Singh Umesh Pratap1* and R. Parthasarathy2

1Ph.D. Research Scholar- NIMS University Jaipur Rajasthan.

2Director-Faculty of Pharmacy, Kamla Nehru Institute of Management and Technology, Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: umeshknimt007@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

The pharmacognostical, phytochemical and toxicological analysis carried out with a focus on diagnostic character will be immense helps in the proper identification and standardization of two botanical species of the Blumea. Blumea is an important genus of family Asteraceae (composite) a important drug used in Ayurvedic medicine. Based on available literature about the plant the Authentification was not available, even the plant have wide traditional therapeutically use so that the Authentification was essential. The first object to evaluate the pharmacognostical characters indicates the authentification and identification by means of morphological, macroscopical, microscopical, physicochemical evaluation, fluorescence studies and preliminary phytochemical evaluation. It may avoid the duplication or substitution with other inferior drug and also adulteration. This study helps in easy and accurate identification of both species giving main concentration on diagnostic characters which may use in differentiation of both species- Blumea lacera var lacera and Blumea eriantha DC. The study helps in the standardization of the herbal drug. The toxicological evaluation helps in dose determination for pharmacological or biological activity evaluation.

 

KEYWORDS: Blumea lacera, Blumea eriantha DC, Asteraceae

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Evaluation of drug means “confirmation of its identity and determination of its quality and purity and detection of nature of adulteration”. The evaluation of crude drug is necessary because of biochemical variation of the drug, deterioration due to treatment and storage and substitutions and adulterations, as results of carelessness, ignorance, fraud. Morphological or organoleptic evaluation refers to evaluation of drugs by color, taste, size, shape and special features like touch, texture etc. Organoleptic evaluation means conclusions drawn from studies resulted due to impressions on organs of senses. The study of form of a crude drug is morphology while description of the form is morphography. Chemical evaluation comprise of different chemical tests and chemical assay.

 

The isolation, purification and identification of active constituents are chemical method of evaluation. The chemical evaluation includes systemic investigation of plant material for its phytochemical behavior involves four different stages like procurement of raw material and quality control, purification and characterization of the constituents of pharmaceutical interest in process quality control, investigation of biosynthetic pathway to particular compounds. Physical evaluation includes ash values, extractive values, moisture content etc. The percentage of active chemical constituents in crude drug is mentioned on air dried basis. The moisture content of a drug should be minimizing in ordered to prevent decomposition of crude drug either due to chemical changes or microbial contamination. Ash value and extractives may be defined as the process in which the crude drug is treated with specific solvents whereby the medicinally active constituents are dissolved out, cell tissue and most of inactive component remain undissolved. Aqueous solvent, water is used as solvent for extraction of many types of active constituents such as proteins, gum, coloring agent, alkaloids, glycoside, sugars and tannins.

1Blumea lacera var lacera:

Synonym: BENGALI- Kukursunga, Kuksung, Barasukung; GUJRATI- Kalara, Chancharamari; HINDI- Kakranda, kukurbanda, divalimuli, janglimuli, kakronda; KARNATKA- Gandharigidda; MARATHI- Burando, Bhanurda; OIIYA- Pokasunga; SANSKRIT- Kukuradru; TAMIL- Narakakarandai, Kattumulangi; TELGU- Karrupogaaku, Adavimullangi.

 

Botonical description: Present throughout plains of india.Annual, with strong odor of turpentine; stem erect, 0.3- 0.9 m; Ash colored, dencely glandular-pubescent. Leaves are2.5 by 2.2- 6.3 cm. lower petiolated, upper subsessile, elliptic oblang or ovovate,silky pubescent on both side, sharply serrate dentate, base tappered Flower are heads 6- 8 mm in diameter numerous in short axillary and terminal spiciform panicles; flower yellow. Corolla-lobes hermaphrodite flowers nearly glabrous. Involucral bracts densely, villous, outer bracts somewhat herbacious, linear- lanceolate. Fruits are Achenes not ribbed, small, oblong,sub-4-gouns.  Leaves of Blumea lacera are used to get rid of from the worm of the anal region; particularly the children of upto age of three year, leaves are applied on cuts water extract reported to taken orally as anthelmintic. (1A)  A combination of Blumea lacera, Echinops echinatus Roxb and Datura stramonium juice or paste used to avoid premature ejaculation. (1B) Whole plant of blumea lacera possessing wound healing activity. (2) Leaf extract of Blumea lacera was most active against test fungus. (3) Whole plant of Blumea lacera used in skin inflammation. (4) Water extract of Blumea  lacera posses a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity and antifungal activity. (5) Root paste taken with honey three times a day to cure diarrhea. (6) Root of blumea lacera used as blood purifier while leaves used to rectify urinary complaints. (7) Blumea lacera an ingredient of an ayurvedic formulation “Pilex” used to treat piles. (8) Plant used as antipyretic, stimulant, astringent, anthelmintic, febrifuge, diuretic and in hemorrhoids(9), bronchitis (10) sores and wound healing (11) The leaves are used as anthelmintic, astringent, diuretic (12, 13, 14), antidysentric (15) Antimicrobial, for healing cuts (16) in urinary troubles (17) in irritation, as haemostatic(18) and anti-inflammatory.(19) The root used in cholera (12, 14). The plant was reported to yield compesterol.(20), two new glycoside, a triterpenoid glycoside 19 alpha- hydrooxy-12-ene-24,28-dioate 3-o-beta-D-xyloprranoside (21) A preliminary screening of the plant showed presence of steroids, terpenoids and alkaloids, flavonoids, saponin and absence of tannin and phnolics. (22) The essential oil isolated from the leaves yielded cineol, (+)-fenchone and citral.(23), 5-hydroxy-3, 6, 7, 3’, 4’-pentamethoxy flavones; 5, 3’, 4’-trimethoxyflavone and very small quantity of an unidentified flavones along with beta-setosterol were reported from the leaves (24) free vitamin c (30 mg/100g) was reported from the leaves ant its content increased significantly (50mg/10g) after frying in oil.(25) .The 50% Ethanolic extract showed effect on guinea pig heart. LD50 of extract was found to be> 1000 mg/kg i.p in mise. (26) Seeds were reported to exhibit antibacterial activity.(27) Essential oil obtained from plant leaves showing insecticidal.(28)

2. Blumea eriantha DC :

Synonym, MARATHI- Nimurdi SANSKRIT: Kukundar, kukundara HINDI: Kukraonda. Dichotomously branched, covered with white and silky hair, distributed in U.P., M.P., Bihar, Karnataka, Maharashtra, and Orissa. Perennial herb up to 1m in height. It is herbaceous; Stem is erect, slender about 30 to 45 cm high, dichotomously branched. Leaves: 2.5-7.5 by 1.5-3.8 cms, alternate and sessile. Leaves are irregularly teethed; these teeth are alternately long and short especially in upper leaves. Lower obovate, short petiolated, upper elliptic- ovate to oblanceolate, cordate clasping. Inflorescence: ¹Heads are 6-8 mm diameter. Corolla lobes of hermaphrodite flowers are hairy. capitula axillary or terminal, with numerous yellow florets, rarely bisexual marginal female, Fruit: achenes brown, shining, sparsely pilos with white pappus. (1A) Paste of leaf of Blumea eriantha used for cuts and wounds. (29) Ethanolic extract showing adulticidal and repellant activity against Musca domestica . (30) Ethanolic extract of plant blumea eriantha showing good . larvicidal and adulticidal activity and extract is very good. Insect repeiiant. (31) Potent Antimicrobial activity of volatile oil obtained from fresh leaves of Blumia eriantha D C leaves reported. Ethanolic extract of Blumea lacera and Blumea eriantha showing significant In-vitro antimicrobial activity. (32) Blumea eriantha plant is used in Rheumatic pain. (33) Blumea eriantha plant leaves used in treatment of cough and common cold. (34) Blumea eriantha Juice of herb used as ‘carminative’. Leaves along Vitex negundo Linn and Careya arborea Boxb as Fomentation, sudorific, diuretic and emmenagogue. Warm infusion is given as sudorific in catarrhal affections .Leaves contain essential oils which have antibacterial, antifungal properties and are also used in dermatological medicaments. (35) The volatile oil from blumea eriantha and powdered seed showed insecticidal activity against Callosobruchus chinesis ans Sitophillus oryzae two stored grain pests. (36) An essential oil possessing camphor like smell and consisting chiefly of α-carvotanacetone and erianthin was obtained from seeds. (37) The vapors of leaf oil were found to interfere predominantly with some component of mating behavior of males in boll worms Earias vitella . (38, 39, 40, 41) LD50 of 50% Ethanolic extract of plant was found to be >1000mg/kg intra-peritoneal in mice. (26) Essential oil extracted from leaves of blumea eriantha and stems showed potent antibacterial activity against E.coli, Bacillus subtilis, Vibrio cholera, Staphlococcus aureus, Salmonella typhii. Oil from plant was found to be active against Trichophyton terrestre, Candida albicans, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae. (42) The structure of erianthin was revised and assigned as 5-hydroxy-3.3’,4’6,7 pentamethoxy flavones.The erianthin (C20H20O8) m.p.-161 oC is identical with artemetin isolated from Artemesia absinthium. (43).

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

The plants were collected from rural area of Sultanpur (Dwarikganj of KNIMT-Faridipur campus) in the month of March-April 2009, and authentification done by Director and Head of Department Pharmacognosy KNIMT- Faculty of Pharmacy and received Authentification certificate, and for

further references and uses well prepared ‘Herbarium File’ submitted in Department of Pharmacy- under voucher specimen- KNIMT-FOP 2009- 2A and KNIMT-FOP 2009- 2B respectively. Microscopical evaluation as per the schedule given by Sass.(44), Sectioning as per standard procedure.(45). Photographs of different magnifications were taken with Nikon Labphot 2 Microscopic Unit. For normal observations bright field was used. For the study of trichomes, crystals, starch grains and lignified cells, polarized light was employed. Since these structures have birefringent property, under polarized light they appear bright against dark background. Magnifications of the figures are indicated by the scale–bars. Descriptive terms of the anatomical features are as given in the standard Anatomy books(46a, 46b), Extractive value(47), Ash values(48), loss on drying(49) were determined by using standard method. Microchemical evaluation done as per Kay LA (1938) (50) Fluorescence analysis of the powder and extracts were carried out.(51)

 

Extraction:

The collected, cleaned and powdered samples were used for the extraction purpose. 150 grams of powdered sample was evenly packed in the soxhlet apparatus. It was extracted with 70% ethanol in adequate quantity. The solvent used was purified before use. After solvent extraction, the extract was filtered while hot through Whatman filter paper to remove any impurities if present. The extract was concentrated by vacuum distillation to reduce the volume to 1/10. The concentrated extract was transferred to 100 ml beaker and the remaining solvent was evaporated on the water bath. Then they were collected and placed in desiccators to remove the excessive moisture. The dried extract were packed in air tight container and used for further studies such as phytochemical screening(47) and toxicological studies as per OECD guidelines.(52)

 

RESULTS:

1. Result for microscopical evaluation. TS of Root

 

Fig. 1: Blumea lacera root without staining

 

Fig.2:Blume alacera root staining with phloroglucinol: HCl (1:1)

 

Description-yellowish-green cortex inner cells distinct, elongated thin walled containg oil glands, cotex-narrow parenchymatous rod shaped crystal of calcium oxalate, phloem-parenchymatous containg intercellular spaces, cells present in inner part (towards the cambium) are smaller without intercellular spaces, phloem fibres present, cambium prominent with tangentially elongated typical cells. xylem consist of xylem vessel, xylem parenchyma and medullary rays, xylem vessel lignified, stones cells are present, medullary rays prominent pith present.

 

Fig. 3: Blumea eriantha DC root without staining

 

Fig. 4: Blumea eriantha DC staining with phloroglucinol: HCl (1:1)

 

Table 1: Result for Microchemical evaluation:


Parts

Treatment

Test for

Reaction B.eriantha

ReactionB.lacera

Results B.eriantha

Results B.lacera

Root

Iodine solution

Starch

Blue color

Blue color (cortex)

++

++

 

Ferric chloride solution

Tannin

No color

No color

_

_

 

Sudan III solution

Oil globules

No change

No change

_

_

 

Con. HCl

Crystals

Effervescence

Effervescence

+

++

 

Phloroglucinol :HCl (1:1)

Lignin

Trichomes and vessels turn red

Trichomes ,xylem and vessels turn red

++

++

Stem

Iodine solution

Starch

Blue color (cortex+ pith)

Blue color (cortex+ pith)

++

++

 

Ferric chloride solution

Tannin

No color

No color

_

_

 

Sudan III solution

Oil globules

Red color

Red color

+

+

 

Con.HCl

Crystals

Effervescence

Effervescence

+

++

 

Phloroglucinol :HCl (1:1)

Lignin

Trichomes, Vessels, fibres and stone cells turn light pink

Trichomes Vessels, fibres and stone cells turn light pink

+

+

Leaves

Iodine solution

Starch

Blue color cortex+ pith

Blue color cortex+ pith

+

+

 

Ferric chloride solution

Tannin

No color

No color

_

_

 

Sudan III solution

Oil globules

Red color

Red color

+

+

 

Con.HCl

Crystals

No change

Effervescence

_

++

 

Phloroglucinol :HCl (1:1)

Lignin

Vessels turn pink.

Xylem .Trichomes turn pink

++

++

Abundantly present= (++); scantly present=( +) ; absent=( -)

 

Table 2: Result for successive extraction values:

Plant species

Pet. ether

Benzene

Chloroform

Acetone

Alcohol

Water

Blumea eriantha DC (% )

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

3.10

2.38

2.35

1.32

1.24

1.02

0.82

0.65

0.44

1.12

1.04

1.02

8.8

8.7

8.5

12.9

12.8

12.5

Blumea lacera var lacera (% )

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

3.11

2.39

2.34

1.34

1.22

1.04

0.93

0.69

053

1.14

1.05

1.03

9.2

9.1

8.9

13.2

13.6

12.4

 

Table 3: Result for ash values, extractive values and moisture content evaluation:

Values

Blumea eriantha DC

Blumea lacera var lacera

Total ash (% w/w) -

 

 

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

8.5

8.8

7.8

8.4

8.9

7.8

Acid insoluble ash (% w/w) -

 

 

  1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

1.3

1.1

1.2

1.1

0.99

1.2

Water soluble ash. ( % w/w)-

 

 

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

7.2

7.7

6.6

7.3

7.6

6.8

Alcohol soluble extractive value (%)

 

 

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

12.9

12.8

12.5

13.2

13.6

12.4

Water soluble extractive value. ( %).

 

 

1.Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

8.8

8.7

8.5

9.2

9.1

8.9

Ether soluble extractive value. ( %).

 

 

1.Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

3.0

2.8

2.5

3.1

2.9

2.4

Moisture content ( % )

1.Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

8.26

13.02

8.48

8.31

12.7

8.21

 


Description- Brownish -green cortex inner cells distinct, elongated thinwalled containg oil glands, cotex-narrow parenchymatous rod shaped crystal of calcium oxalate, phloem-parenchymatous containg intercellular spaces, cells present in inner part (towards the cambium) are smaller without intercellular spaces, phloem fibres present, cambium prominent with tangentially elongated typical cells. xylem consist of xylem vessel, xylem parenchyma and medullary rays, xylem vessel lignified, stones cells are present. medullary rays prominent. pith present. patches of sieve tubes.

2. TS of leaf

Description-wavy wall, ractangular arrangement, palisade parenchyma elongated, compactly arranged, calcium oxalate crystal present rod shaped, starch grain present. covering trichomes unlignified and uniseriate, multicellular with acute apex, glandular trichomes biseriate multicellular.

 

Fig. 5: Blumea lacera Staining with phloroglucinol: HCl (1:1

 

Fig. 6: Blumea lacera covering trichomes without staining

 

Fig. 7: Blumea eriantha showing covering trichomes

 

Fig. 8: Blumea eriantha showing glandula trichomes without staining

 

Description- wavy wall, ractangular arrangement, palisade parenchyma elongated, compactly arranged,collenchyma present, xylem- endarch, calcium oxalate crystal present rod shaped, starch grain present. covering trichomes unlignified and uniseriate, multicellular with acute apex, glandular trichomes biseriate multicellular club shaped..

 

3. TS of Stem

Fig. 9: Blumea lacera staining with phloroglucinol: HCl (1:1)

 

Fig. 10: Blumea eriantha staining with phloroglucinol: HCl (1:1)

 

Description-epidermis single layered with thick cuticle, shunken stomata between vertical ridges present, cortex3-4 layered parenchmatous below epidermis loosely arranged palisade like cells are present, non lignified uniseriate multicellular covering trichomes are present, glandular trichomes are biseriate, multicellular and club shaped, pericyclic fibres are lignified, covering phloem on its outer side, vascular bundles-colateral, conjoint open and arranged in ring, xylem well developed.



Table 4: Result for fluorescence evaluation:

Treatment

Observed under visible ray

Observed under UV ray (254 nm)

Observed under UV ray (365 nm).

B.eriantha

B.lacera

B.eriantha

B.lacera

B.eriantha

B.lacera

Powder as such           1. Leaves 

                                    2. Stem 

                                    3. Root 

GG

DSG

DSG

DGG

SG

SYG

DSYG

SYG

SYG

BYG

YG

DG

YG

DYG

DYG

DYG

DYR

DYG

In methanol                  1. Leaves

                                    2. Stem 

                                    3. Root 

GG

DGG

SYG

DGG

SGG

DGG

YG

DYG

SYG

BYG

SYG

SG

DYR

YR

YR

YR

SYR

YR

In methanolic NaOH  1. Leaves 

                                    2. Stem 

                                    3. Root

GG

DGG

SYG

SYG

YG

SG

YG

DYG

SYG

BYG

BG

SBG

BSB

SB

SB

LSB

BSB

SB

In ethanol                    1. Leaves

                                    2. Stem 

                                    3. Root

GG

DGG

SYG

SYG

YG

SG

YG

DYG

SYG

BYG

YG

YG

DCR

CR

BCR

DCR

CR

BCR

In Ethanolic NaOH    1. Leaves

                                   2. Stem 

                                   3. Root 

GG

DGG

SYG

SYG

YG

SG

GY

DGY

SYG

BYG

DSG

SG

BSG

BSB

BSB

DB

DB

BSB

In dill HCl                  1. Leaves

                                    2. Stem 

                                    3. Root

GG

DGG

SYG

YG

DYG

SYG

GG

SGG

SYG

DYG

SGG

SBG

GG

DGG

SGG

GG

DGG

SGG

Abbreviations: DSG= Dull Straw Green, GG= Grayish Green, DSYG= Dull Straw Yellowish Green, BYG=Bright Yellowish Green, DYG= Dull Yellowish Green, YG= Yellowish Green, DGG= Dull Grayish Green, DYR= Dull Yellowish Red, SYG= Straw Yellowish Green, BGY= Bright Greenish Yellow, BSB= Bright Sky Blue, DG= Dirty Blue, DCR=Dull Crimson Red,

 


Table 5: Result for preliminary phytochemical evaluation: Ethanolic extracts (70 % v/v)

Extracts

Constituents

Blumea eriantha DC

Blumea lacera var lacera

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

Alkaloid

-

-

-

+

+

-                                                                                                                                                                    

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

Carbohydrate

+

+

++

+

+

++

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

Phytosterol

+

+

+

++

++

+

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

Phenolic compounds

+

++

-

-

-

-

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

Tannins

-

-

-

-

-

-

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

Saponin

+

+

+

++

+

+

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

Glycoside 

-

-

-

+

++

+

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

Terpenoids

+

+

-

++

+

+

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

Flavenoids

++

++

+

++

++

+

 

Table 6: Acute toxicity study:

Group

Extracts

No. of animal

Dose in mg/kg

Result

Result

Blumea lacera

Blumea eriantha DC

1.

2.

3.

1.Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

3

3

3

5

5

5

No death

No death

No death

No death

No death

No death

4.

5.

6.

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

3

3

3

50

50

50

No death

No death

No death

No death

No death

No death

7.

8.

9.

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

3

3

3

300

300

300

No death

No death

No death

No death

No death

No death

10.

11.

12.

1. Leaves

2. Stem

3. Root

3

3

3

2000

2000

2000

2 death

1 death

1 death

1 death

1 death

1 death

 


Description-Epidermis single layered with thick cuticle, shunken stomata between vertical ridges present, cortex3-4 layered parenchmatous below epidermis loosely arranged palisade like cells are present, non lignified uniseriate multicellular covering trichomes are present, glandular trichomes are biseriate, multicellular and club shaped, pericyclic fibres are lignified,covering phloem on its outer side, vascular bundles-colateral, conjoint open and arranged in ring, xylem well developed.Pith thinwalled, lignified, parenchymatous with intercellular space.

 

Fig. 11: Blumea lacera leaf staining with phloroglucinol: HCl (1:1)

 

 Fig. 12:Blumea eriantha without staining

 

DISCUSSION:

Microscopical evaluation basically targeted on diagnostic characters. In Blumea lacera characteristic arrangement of xylem in radial row in the stem, presence of uniserrate, multicelluler covering trichomes and biseriate multicelluler club shaped glandular trichomes which terns pinkish when stained with phloroglucinol+ HCl. Oil glands and ring of stone cells present in the stem of both plants.Thin section of root of both plants showing blue color when treated with weak iodine solution. Stomata are very common in epidermis of leaf in both species and it is diacytic type.

 

Other diagnostic characters which are analyzed are resinous cells in root, spindle shaped fibres in root, pericycle made up of 1-2 layer of parenchyma in the stem. Physicochemical analysis like total ash, water soluble ash, acid insoluble ash values, different extractive values, fluorescence studies, successive solvent extraction values of both species are presented in table 1- 6. Acute toxicological study result presented in table which clears the LD 50 value of both plant is more than 2000 mg/kg body weight (LD 50> 2000mg/kg body weight.) Therefore ED 50 or dose for pharmacological activity can be easily calculated.  

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The author is very thankful to the Director Kamla Nehru Institute of Management and Technology -Faculty of Pharmacy, Sultanpur , for providing the necessary facilities  and guidelines to carry out the research work in respect of NIMS University Jaipur Rajasthan India.

 

REFERENCES:

1.         1A.    Kritikar KR, Basu BD, “Indian Medicinal Plants”, Vol I, 2nd edition 2008, International Book Distributor, Page no. 314.

1B.    Amist J Patel; ET AL;  “ Comparative diuretic activity of root and aerial part of methanolic extract of Echinops echinatus Roxb.; Der Phamacia letter; 2011; 3(5); 168-172.

2.         Sandhya SS; et al; “Plants as potent Antidiabetic and wound healing agents-A Review” ; Hygia JD,Med; vol 3(1); 2011; 11-19

3.         Ahsan Beg, et al ; “Antifungal assay of some angiospermic plant extract against Fusarium lycopersicum”; Indian Journal of Applied and Pure Biology; vol 26 (1); 71-74 (2011).

4.         Parmiladevi B; et al; “Inflammation and medicinal plants-An Ethanomedicinal Approach”; Journal of Phytology; 2010; 2(2); 49-56.

5.         Ritu mahajan et al; “Ethanobotonical significance and antimicrobial activity of Blumea lacera (Roxb) DC”; International Journal of  pharmaceutical and biological Archives 2010; 1(30; 314-316.

6.         Sunil kumar sen; Lalit mohan Behra; “Ethanomedicinal plant used by the tribal of Bargarh district to cure diarrhea and dysentery”; Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge;vol 7 (3), July 2008; pp. 425-428.

7.         Vanilla D; Ghanthi kumar S; Manickam VS “ Ethnomedicinal use of plants in the plain area of the Tirunevelli district Tamilnadu, India” Ethanobotonical leaflets 12; 1198-1205; 2008.

8.         Varandani BP; “Indigenous therapy for piles”; The Indian practitioner; (1969); (xxii); 9; 545-547.

9.         Bhatnager et al (1973); “Medico-botonical studies on the flora of Ghatigaon forests, Gwalior, MP; J Res Indian Med 8(2); 67-100.

10.       Pandit BR et al, (1996) “Ethnomedicinal plant lore from Gir forest; Gujarat; Adv Plant Sci 9; 81-84.

11.       Jha RR and verma SK, (1996); “Ethnobotony of Sauria Paharias of Santhal Pargana; Bihar; Indian Medicinal plants; Ethanobotony 8; 31-35.

12.       Ahluwalia KS, 1968; Medicinal plants of Kerala-V Nagarjuna 11; 363-369.

13.       Sharma NK , 1990; Ethnomedicine of Mukundaras (S E Rajasthan)-Plant remedies used in guinea worm ( Narru) disease. Bull BOT Surv India 32; 116-120.

14.       Chaudhary RK; et al, 1995; “ Eco-forestic survey utter Danapur district,West Bengal with refrence to some traditionally used medicinal plants; Int J Mendel 12(1-4); 41-43.

15.       Chandra K  and Pandey BN ,1985; “ Medicinal plants of Santhal Pargana district Dhumka (Bihar); Part-1; Sachitra Ayurved 38; 307-314.

16.       Upadhyay et al ,1998; “ Ethanobotonical study of skin treatment uses of medicinal plants of Bihar”; Pharmaceutical Biology 36; 167-172.

17.       Joshi MC; et al, 1980; “Some folk medicine of Danga, Gujarat state; Bull Med Ethnobot Res 1; 8-24.

18.       Singh H , 1988; “ Ethnobotonical treatment of piles by Bhoxas of utterpradesh”; Ancient Sci Life 8; 167-170.

19.       Kakrani HKN and Saluja AK, 1994; “ Traditional through herbs  in Kutch district Gujarat state India  ; Part 2; Analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antirheumatic, antiarthritic plants; Fitoterapia 65; 427-430.

20.       Pal R; et al, 1972; Compesterol from Blumea lacera; Phytochemistry 11; 1855

21.       Agarwal R; et al, 1995; “ Triterpenoid and phenylated phenol glycosides from Blumea lacera;”; Phytochemistry 38; 935-938.

22.       Mukherjee K and Ray LN, 1986; Phytochemical screening of some Indian medicinal plant species;  PART-2; Int J Crude Drug Res 24; 187-205.

23.       Baslas KK and Deshpandey SS, 1950; Essential oil from the leaves of Blumea lacera; J Indian Chem Soc 27; 25-28.

24.       Rao B; et al, 1977; Flavenoids from Blumea lacera; Planta Med 31; 235-237.

25.       Basu NM; et al, 1947; On the vitamin C and carotene content of several hearbs and flowers used in ayurvedic system of medicine.; J Indian Chem Soc 24; 358-360.

26.       Bhakuni DS; et al ,1969; Screening of Indian plants for biological activity.; Part 2; Indian J Exp Biol 7; 250-262.

27.       Bagchi GD ; et al, 1997; Antimicrobial  activities observed in the seeds of higher plants found to grow on the cattle dung.; J Med Aromat Plant Sci 19; 980-987.

28.       Khanolkar UM and Kokate CK, 1979b; Insecticidal activity of volatile oils of Blumea lacera DC and Blumea malcolmii Hook.f.; Pesticides 13(9); 48.

29.       D.N. Gayake et al (2012) ; plants used in medicine folklore of Ahmadnager distict , Maharastra Part of leaf Indian “Journal of pharmaceutical education and research”, vol. (3) page – 19-24.

30.       Sharma P.P., Pardeshi A.B. et al (2011); Bioactivity of some medicinal plant extract against Musca domestica , journal of  Ecobiotecnoology , volume 3,no.9 (14-16)

31.       Mingchen ; hui – zi-jin et al (2009) ;  Review ; chemical constituents of plants from the genus blumea ; chemistry of biodiversity – volume 6 , issue -6 , page-809-817

32.       Dabur Rajesh,  Singh DD; et al (2005) ; In-vitro antimicrobial activity of Blumea lacera and Blumea eriantha , JDRAS  vol , 30 (3-4) , 77-88.

33.       Tiwari V.J. 1995, “Ethnobotanical survey of Halbi tribe of Chandrapur and Gadchirali district of Maharashtra state, India, Filoterapia 66, 346-350.

34.       Sadhale A, Majumdar A.M. ( 1991)  Ethnobotanical studies of sacred grove at Ajiwali district, Journal econ tax botany 15, 167-172.

35.       The Wealth of India,Raw Materials, Vol I ( Reprint 2006), Revised edition 1976, page no.229.

36.       Mohanty K.K, Chakraborty D.P. and Roy. S. 1988, Insecticidal properties of some Indiginous plants against stored grain pestsSci cult- 54, 207- 209.

37.       Mohanty K.K, Chakraborty D.P. and Roy. S. 1988, Insecticidal properties of some Indiginous plants against stored grain pestsSci cult- 54, 207- 209.

38.       Dongre T.K. , Rahalkan G.W. (1982)  ;Effect of Blumea eriantha (compositae) oil on reproduction in Earias vitella F.- Experentia , V.38(1)page- 98-99

39.       Dongre TK and Rahalkar GW (1980), Blumea species (Compositae), Insecticidal from plants. JournalCommon Dis 12, 39-41.

40.       Dongre T.K. and Rahalkar G.W(1980 ), Biology and Agriculture division, Bhaba Atomic research center , Bombay 400085                         

41.       41. Dongre T.K. , Rahalkar G.W. (1980)   “Blumea species”(composita) insecticide from plant ; journal of communicable disease volume 12 , no.1 page – 39-41

42.       Jain SR and Kar A, (1971) Antibacterial activity of some oils and their combination, Plant Med-20, 118-123.

43.       43.Bose P.K., Barua A.K., Chakarwarti P, 1968, ‘Revised structure of erianthin ,flavanol from Blumea  eriantha DC, Jornal Indian Chem, Society 45,851-852.

44.       Sass JE, 1940; Elements of botanical Micro technique. McGraw Hill Book Co; New York, 1940, 222.

45.       Henry AN; Kumari, GR., Chitra, Flora of Tamilnadu, India. Botanical survey of India, Southern Circle, Coimbatore, India, Vol I 1987, 258.

46.       Johansen DA, Plant Micro technique. Mc Graw Hill Book Co; New York.1940.10. Metcalfe CR, Chalk L. Anatomy of Dicotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Vol I and II.1950

47.       Johansen DA,  Plant Micro technique. Mc Graw Hill Book Co; New York.1940.10. Metcalfe CR, Chalk L. Anatomy of Dicotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Vol I and II.1950

48.       48a. Easu K. Plant Anatomy John Wiley and sons. New York, 1964, 767

49.       48b. Easu K. 1979. Anatomy of seed Plants. John Wiley and sons. New York, 550

50.       Anonymous, Indian Pharmacopoeia Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India. New Delhi: Controller of Publication; 1996. p. A-47, A -53, A-54.

51.       Kay LA, The microscopic studies of drugs, Bailliere Tindall and Cox, London, 1938, pp. 77-96.

52.       Kokoski CJ, Kokoski RJ, Sharma M, Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs and ultraviolet radiation, J Amer Pharm Ass, 1958, 47, 715- 717.

53.       OECD (2000) Guidance Document on Acute Oral Toxicity. Environmental Health and Safety Monograph Series on Testing and Assessment No 24

 

 

 

 

Received on 28.05.2012       Modified on 07.05.2012

Accepted on 15.06.2012      © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 5(6): June 2012; Page 834-841